Timeline for Impulse signal detection
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15 at 8:55 | comment | added | Nate River | Yep, you could still answer that if you want. I will unaccept the answer so the problem will display as still open, but enjoy the +500 imaginary points as my show of gratitude! | |
| Oct 15 at 8:00 | comment | added | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | Wait a minute, there is still another question open, the one about the rate of convergence. Time permitting, I will get back to it later this week. Oh, and thanks for the edit, that is what I meant. | |
| Oct 14 at 23:07 | vote | accept | Nate River | ||
| Oct 15 at 8:55 | |||||
| Oct 14 at 23:05 | history | bounty ended | Nate River | ||
| Oct 14 at 23:05 | comment | added | Nate River | The solution checks out IMO, very nicely done. | |
| Oct 14 at 23:04 | vote | accept | Nate River | ||
| Oct 14 at 23:07 | |||||
| Oct 14 at 23:04 | history | edited | Nate River | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 14 at 23:03 | comment | added | Nate River | I assume you meant $W_{k+t} - W_k$ everywhere, so I am modifying it, but please let me know if I am mistaken! | |
| Oct 14 at 21:56 | comment | added | Nate River | Hm, I will check this in detail soon, interesting idea. | |
| Oct 14 at 21:49 | history | answered | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |