Timeline for Stokes theorem for Lipschitz forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13 at 20:56 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated a broken link
|
| Oct 13 at 15:07 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added a description of Segre's approach
|
| Oct 13 at 12:24 | comment | added | Ben McKay | Thanks. I wasn't thinking about how many languages and terminological traditions you are straddling. | |
| Oct 12 at 21:10 | comment | added | Daniele Tampieri | @BenMcKay note that Gillis uses a somewhat more modern terminology, calling $M$ a "variété fermé". | |
| Oct 12 at 21:04 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected a slip in terminology and a typo in the references
|
| Oct 12 at 21:03 | comment | added | Daniele Tampieri | @BenMcKay I should have written "compact" (and I'll correct the post). Segre uses the locution "$n$-field" (precisely $n$-campo) which is a old fashioned Italian word for a compact manifold: however the slip is mine as the first time when I looked at this papers I was working on compact manifolds embedded in $\Bbb R^n$, which can be thought as bounded sets. | |
| Oct 12 at 20:31 | comment | added | Ben McKay | What does it mean that a smooth manifold is bounded? | |
| Oct 12 at 19:12 | history | answered | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |