Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 8, 2012 at 14:07 vote accept Vanessa
Dec 2, 2010 at 21:01 comment added Vanessa In fact, we can set $u(x)=sup_y{|K(x,y)|}^{1/2}$ $v(y)=sup_x{|K(x,y)|}^{1/2}$ This is a bit cheating since v(y) is not smooth and thus cannot be integrated against a tempered distribution. However, it appears quite certain that one can always choose a Schwartz function larger than any given continuous rapidly decreasing function.
Dec 2, 2010 at 17:42 comment added Vanessa OK, I have another guess. $$|K(x,y)|<=u(x)v(y)$$ for some rapidly decreasing u and v (I'm not sure how to show this yet but it sounds plausible). Now we can run the argument again with inequalities: $$|h(t)|=|∫f(x−t)K(x,y)g(y−t)dxdy|<=∫|f(x−t)K(x,y)g(y−t)|dxdy<=∫|f(x−t)|u(x)v(y)|g(y−t)|dxdy=[∫|f(x−t)|u(x)dx][∫|g(y−t)|v(y)dy]$$ The 1st factor is rapidly decreasing whereas the 2nd factor of slow growth hence the product is rapidly decreasing
Dec 2, 2010 at 17:39 history edited Vanessa CC BY-SA 2.5
fixed small error
Dec 2, 2010 at 15:44 comment added Willie Wong You are mostly there. Hint: first show that $\tilde{K}_t(y) = \int f(x-t)K(x,y) dx$ is (a) a Schwartz function in $y$, and (b) has its Schwartz seminorms a rapidly decreasing function of $t$. This should follow once you take an upper envelope for $K$.
Dec 2, 2010 at 15:31 history edited Vanessa CC BY-SA 2.5
Some thoughts so far
Dec 2, 2010 at 15:23 answer added Willie Wong timeline score: 2
Dec 2, 2010 at 11:49 history edited Willie Wong CC BY-SA 2.5
fixed typo in title
Dec 2, 2010 at 11:43 history edited Vanessa CC BY-SA 2.5
added a missing condition
Dec 2, 2010 at 11:27 history edited Andrey Rekalo CC BY-SA 2.5
TeX
Dec 2, 2010 at 11:24 history asked Vanessa CC BY-SA 2.5