Timeline for Is "every infinite set of strictly subnumerous sets is supernumerous to its union" equivalent to AC?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 5 at 23:02 | comment | added | Farmer S | @HanulJeon well, right, I didn't actually need to say that, and in the end they are both just equivalent to AC. I suppose I was just remarking that a version of the hypothesis that is superficially weaker than the original one is enough. | |
Oct 5 at 20:49 | comment | added | Hanul Jeon | Do not we need the first two line of your answer? It seems to me that you proved every set is well-orderable from Zuhair's hypothesis. | |
Oct 5 at 0:57 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Very nice observation. | |
Oct 4 at 22:59 | vote | accept | Zuhair Al-Johar | ||
Oct 4 at 22:38 | history | answered | Farmer S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |