Timeline for Constrained optimization over a set of functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2 at 13:34 | vote | accept | Arkadi Predtetchinski | ||
| Oct 1 at 18:48 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 493 characters in body
|
| Oct 1 at 18:29 | comment | added | Arkadi Predtetchinski | You are right: I meant f real-valued non-negative. The upper bound on the integral is particularly helpful. | |
| Oct 1 at 18:03 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 251 characters in body
|
| Oct 1 at 17:50 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 1 at 17:49 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @AlekseiKulikov : The case $f\ge0$, too, has now been (partially) considered. | |
| Oct 1 at 17:39 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 291 characters in body
|
| Oct 1 at 17:34 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 291 characters in body
|
| Oct 1 at 17:08 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @AlekseiKulikov : This is what I suspected. On the other hand, I see "real-valued". | |
| Oct 1 at 17:04 | comment | added | Aleksei Kulikov | While this answer is technically correct, I am willing to bet that Arkadi had in mind that $f$ must be non-negative... | |
| Oct 1 at 16:54 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |