Skip to main content
added 300 characters in body
Source Link
Martin Brandenburg
  • 63.1k
  • 11
  • 207
  • 424

In a comment Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. They can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. For reference, let me write them down:

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

Update. According to the now proven classification in terms of deflationary maps, let me also mention the corresponding $16$ deflationary maps $M : P([2]) \to P([2])$:

  • $M(\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$
  • $M(\{1\})$ can be one of $\emptyset, \{1\}$
  • $M(\{2\})$ can be one of $\emptyset, \{2\}$
  • $M(\{1,2\})$ can be one of $\emptyset, \{1\}, \{2\}, \{1,2\}$

In a comment Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. They can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. For reference, let me write them down:

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

In a comment Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. They can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. For reference, let me write them down:

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

Update. According to the now proven classification in terms of deflationary maps, let me also mention the corresponding $16$ deflationary maps $M : P([2]) \to P([2])$:

  • $M(\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$
  • $M(\{1\})$ can be one of $\emptyset, \{1\}$
  • $M(\{2\})$ can be one of $\emptyset, \{2\}$
  • $M(\{1,2\})$ can be one of $\emptyset, \{1\}, \{2\}, \{1,2\}$
Adding which Peter, since there is now another in the thread
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

In a comment Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. They can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. For reference, let me write them down:

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

In a comment Peter has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. They can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. For reference, let me write them down:

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

In a comment Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. They can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. For reference, let me write them down:

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

removing ChatGPT's list, use Peter's description
Source Link
Martin Brandenburg
  • 63.1k
  • 11
  • 207
  • 424

In a comment Peter has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. Here they are. These expression have been generated using ChatGPT, so need some verificationThey can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. It's not a proper answer, hence CWFor reference, but I also didn't want to add these to the post itself to reduce scrolling.$ \newcommand\template[4]{\begin{cases} #1 & \text{if both $U_1 = \emptyset$ and $U_2 = \emptyset$} \\ #2 & \text{if $U_1 \ne \emptyset$ and $U_2 = \emptyset$} \\ #3 & \text{if $U_1 = \emptyset$ and $U_2 \ne \emptyset$} \\ #4 & \text{if $U_1 \ne \emptyset$ and $U_2 \ne \emptyset$.} \end{cases}} \newcommand\e{\emptyset}$let me write them down:

  1. $\emptyset$

  2. $\template\e\e\e{U_1}$

  3. $\template\e\e\e{U_2}$

  4. $\template\e\e\e{U_1 \cup U_2}$

  5. $\template\e\e{U_2}\e$

  6. $\template\e\e{U_2}{U_1}$

  7. $\template\e\e{U_2}{U_2}$

  8. $\template\e\e{U_2}{U_1 \cup U_2}$

  9. $\template\e{U_1}\e\e$

  10. $\template\e{U_1}\e{U_1}$

  11. $\template\e{U_1}\e{U_2}$

  12. $\template\e{U_1}\e{U_1 \cup U_2}$

  13. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}\e$

  14. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}{U_1}$

  15. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}{U_2}$

  16. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}{U_1 \cup U_2}$

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

In a comment Peter has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. Here they are. These expression have been generated using ChatGPT, so need some verification. It's not a proper answer, hence CW, but I also didn't want to add these to the post itself to reduce scrolling.$ \newcommand\template[4]{\begin{cases} #1 & \text{if both $U_1 = \emptyset$ and $U_2 = \emptyset$} \\ #2 & \text{if $U_1 \ne \emptyset$ and $U_2 = \emptyset$} \\ #3 & \text{if $U_1 = \emptyset$ and $U_2 \ne \emptyset$} \\ #4 & \text{if $U_1 \ne \emptyset$ and $U_2 \ne \emptyset$.} \end{cases}} \newcommand\e{\emptyset}$

  1. $\emptyset$

  2. $\template\e\e\e{U_1}$

  3. $\template\e\e\e{U_2}$

  4. $\template\e\e\e{U_1 \cup U_2}$

  5. $\template\e\e{U_2}\e$

  6. $\template\e\e{U_2}{U_1}$

  7. $\template\e\e{U_2}{U_2}$

  8. $\template\e\e{U_2}{U_1 \cup U_2}$

  9. $\template\e{U_1}\e\e$

  10. $\template\e{U_1}\e{U_1}$

  11. $\template\e{U_1}\e{U_2}$

  12. $\template\e{U_1}\e{U_1 \cup U_2}$

  13. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}\e$

  14. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}{U_1}$

  15. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}{U_2}$

  16. $\template\e{U_1}{U_2}{U_1 \cup U_2}$

In a comment Peter has conjectured a classification, which shows that there are $16$ (!) binary subset operations. They can be combined from $1 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 4$ independent cases. For reference, let me write them down:

  • $\alpha(\emptyset,\emptyset)$ must be $\emptyset$

  • For non-empty sets $U$, $\alpha(U,\emptyset)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $U$

  • For non-empty sets $V$, $\alpha(\emptyset,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset$, $V$

  • For non-empty sets $U,V$, $\alpha(U,V)$ can be one of $\emptyset, U, V, U \cup V$.

Fixing redundancy pointed out by @PeterTaylor (https://mathoverflow.net/posts/comments/1248406)
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69
Loading
Numbering; `\template`
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69
Loading
Numbering
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69
Loading
Source Link
Martin Brandenburg
  • 63.1k
  • 11
  • 207
  • 424
Loading
Post Made Community Wiki by Martin Brandenburg