Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 19 at 6:40 comment added Wilberd van der Kallen @Melon_Musk Just delete 'group' and replace 'homomorphism' with 'morphism'.
Sep 18 at 18:26 comment added Melon_Musk @WilberdvanderKallen Could you expand your comment? What exactly is the definition related to affine schemes?
Sep 18 at 7:35 comment added Wilberd van der Kallen The main reason for the terminology is that this is the definition for affine schemes. One would not want a different meaning for affine group schemes.
Sep 18 at 2:07 comment added Christopher Drupieski Perhaps if $B' = S^{-1}A$ is a localization of $A$, then the canonical map $\phi: A \to B'$ is an epimorphism of commutative rings (but not a surjective ring homomorphism), and then the corresponding map of affine schemes is a monomorphism? At any rate, this question could be relevant: What do epimorphisms of (commutative) rings look like?
Sep 17 at 15:39 history edited Melon_Musk CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Sep 17 at 12:45 history edited Melon_Musk CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Sep 17 at 12:44 comment added Melon_Musk Yes yes, I messed up while writing. Edited now
Sep 17 at 12:09 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Link to book
Sep 17 at 12:03 comment added LSpice I think your algebra map is the wrong way around: a map of schemes from $H'$ to $G$ should be a map of algebras from $A$ to $B'$, not $B'$ to $A$. \\ I don't know an example off the top of my head, but note that a closed embedding is not just an injection on the functorial level, but an isomorphism of $H'$ with a closed subgroup of $G$.
Sep 17 at 12:01 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Tidying
Sep 17 at 11:39 history asked Melon_Musk CC BY-SA 4.0