Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 19 at 4:01 history edited GH from MO
edited tags; edited tags; edited tags
Sep 17 at 13:48 history edited Venus
edited tags
Sep 16 at 8:52 history edited GH from MO
edited tags
Sep 16 at 6:41 comment added GH from MO I added a proof which requires no machine calculation and is cleaner (in my opinion) than the two proofs already posted. Moreover, it shows that there is a real root not exceeding $(5-\sqrt{15})/10$, and this estimate is optimal.
Sep 16 at 6:06 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
made title more specific, added tag
Sep 16 at 5:31 answer added GH from MO timeline score: 12
Sep 15 at 19:37 comment added Steven Stadnicki @IosifPinelis I think it's an excellent question and have certainly not downvoted/closevoted, but I suspect the folks who are are hoping for more context; it's clear that this polynomial comes from somewhere rather than appearing like Venus from the waves, and it would be helpful/interesting/etc. to know its origins.
Sep 15 at 16:38 comment added GH from MO I removed the tag "root-systems" as it is not relevant for the problem. Regarding root systems, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_system
Sep 15 at 16:36 history edited GH from MO
edited tags
Sep 15 at 14:57 history became hot network question
Sep 15 at 14:45 answer added River Li timeline score: 7
Sep 15 at 13:42 comment added Iosif Pinelis I don't understand the close votes. The problem does not seem quite trivial, and it could possibly have arisen in some research.
Sep 15 at 13:37 answer added Iosif Pinelis timeline score: 7
Sep 15 at 12:10 history edited Venus
edited tags
Sep 15 at 10:14 history edited Venus CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Sep 15 at 10:03 comment added Venus @FedorPetrov Do you have any insights on finding the answer? Thanks.
Sep 15 at 9:02 comment added Venus @FedorPetrov Thank you for your comment. It has been revised. Thanks.
Sep 15 at 9:01 history edited Venus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 37 characters in body
Sep 15 at 8:38 history edited Venus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 57 characters in body
Sep 15 at 7:06 comment added Fedor Petrov I am suspicious about conditions on $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$: the restriction $\alpha+\beta+\gamma\le 2\pi$ seems useless, since if it does not hold, you may replace $\alpha, \beta$ to $\pi-\alpha, \pi-\beta$ and the polynomial does not change. Are you sure that we do not require additionally that $\alpha+\beta\ge \gamma$ etc?
Sep 15 at 6:58 comment added Venus @FedorPetrov It may not be completely that, but do you have any insights on finding the answer regarding the algebraic or analytic property of polynomials? Thanks.
Sep 15 at 6:32 review Close votes
Sep 20 at 8:09
Sep 15 at 5:56 comment added Fedor Petrov This looks like a characteristic polynomial of a certain $3\times 3$ matrix, is not it arised this way?
Sep 15 at 5:29 comment added Venus I have performed numerous computations but have not found any counterexample.
Sep 15 at 5:28 history asked Venus CC BY-SA 4.0