Skip to main content
added 195 characters in body
Source Link
H A Helfgott
  • 20.2k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 126

Here is an inequality one can in fact prove by the duality principle (Théorème 5 in Bombieri's Le grand crible, ignoring terms with $a\ne 0$):

$$\sum_{q\leq Q} \frac{\mu^2(q)}{q} \left(\frac{1}{N} \sum_{d|q} \mu(d) d \sum_{\substack{n\leq N\\d|n}} a_n\right)^2 \leq 2.$$

It is straightforward to use this inequality to prove that $\frac{1}{N/q} \sum_{n\leq N: q|n} a_n - \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n\leq N} a_n$ is small for most $q$ having a bounded number of small prime factors -- meaning $\sum_{q\in S_\epsilon} 1/q \gg_k (\log \log Q)^k$ for every $k\geq 1$. One can probabilyprobably push this argument up to $k = \sqrt{\log \log N}$ or so.

Can one go farther, possibly by other means?

Update: (a) as Will Sawin showed, one cannot go farther, (b) as my new answer shows, yes, one can go up to $k$ in the order of $\sqrt{\log \log N}$ (or rather $\epsilon \sqrt{\log \log N}$).

Here is an inequality one can in fact prove by the duality principle (Théorème 5 in Bombieri's Le grand crible, ignoring terms with $a\ne 0$):

$$\sum_{q\leq Q} \frac{\mu^2(q)}{q} \left(\frac{1}{N} \sum_{d|q} \mu(d) d \sum_{\substack{n\leq N\\d|n}} a_n\right)^2 \leq 2.$$

It is straightforward to use this inequality to prove that $\frac{1}{N/q} \sum_{n\leq N: q|n} a_n - \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n\leq N} a_n$ is small for most $q$ having a bounded number of small prime factors -- meaning $\sum_{q\in S_\epsilon} 1/q \gg_k (\log \log Q)^k$ for every $k\geq 1$. One can probabily push this argument up to $k = \sqrt{\log \log N}$ or so.

Can one go farther, possibly by other means?

Here is an inequality one can in fact prove by the duality principle (Théorème 5 in Bombieri's Le grand crible, ignoring terms with $a\ne 0$):

$$\sum_{q\leq Q} \frac{\mu^2(q)}{q} \left(\frac{1}{N} \sum_{d|q} \mu(d) d \sum_{\substack{n\leq N\\d|n}} a_n\right)^2 \leq 2.$$

It is straightforward to use this inequality to prove that $\frac{1}{N/q} \sum_{n\leq N: q|n} a_n - \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n\leq N} a_n$ is small for most $q$ having a bounded number of small prime factors -- meaning $\sum_{q\in S_\epsilon} 1/q \gg_k (\log \log Q)^k$ for every $k\geq 1$. One can probably push this argument up to $k = \sqrt{\log \log N}$ or so.

Can one go farther, possibly by other means?

Update: (a) as Will Sawin showed, one cannot go farther, (b) as my new answer shows, yes, one can go up to $k$ in the order of $\sqrt{\log \log N}$ (or rather $\epsilon \sqrt{\log \log N}$).

added 48 characters in body
Source Link
H A Helfgott
  • 20.2k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 126

Here is an inequality one can in fact prove by the duality principle (Théorème 5 in Bombieri's Le grand crible, ignoring terms with $a\ne 0$):

$$\sum_{q\leq Q} \frac{\mu^2(q)}{q} \left(\frac{1}{N} \sum_{d|q} \mu(d) d \sum_{\substack{n\leq N\\d|n}} a_n\right)^2 \leq 2.$$

It is straightforward to use this inequality to prove that $\frac{1}{N/q} \sum_{n\leq N: q|n} a_n - \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n\leq N} a_n$ is small for most $q$ having a bounded number of small prime factors -- meaning $\sum_{q\in S_\epsilon} 1/q \gg_k (\log \log Q)^k$ for every $k\geq 1$. One can probabily push this argument up to $k = \sqrt{\log \log N}$ or so.

Can one go farther, possibly by other means?

Here is an inequality one can in fact prove by the duality principle (Théorème 5 in Bombieri's Le grand crible, ignoring terms with $a\ne 0$):

$$\sum_{q\leq Q} \frac{\mu^2(q)}{q} \left(\frac{1}{N} \sum_{d|q} \mu(d) d \sum_{\substack{n\leq N\\d|n}} a_n\right)^2 \leq 2.$$

It is straightforward to use this inequality to prove that $\frac{1}{N/q} \sum_{n\leq N: q|n} a_n - \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n\leq N} a_n$ is small for most $q$ having a bounded number of small prime factors -- meaning $\sum_{q\in S_\epsilon} 1/q \gg_k (\log \log Q)^k$ for every $k\geq 1$. One can probabily push this argument up to $k = \sqrt{\log \log N}$ or so.

Here is an inequality one can in fact prove by the duality principle (Théorème 5 in Bombieri's Le grand crible, ignoring terms with $a\ne 0$):

$$\sum_{q\leq Q} \frac{\mu^2(q)}{q} \left(\frac{1}{N} \sum_{d|q} \mu(d) d \sum_{\substack{n\leq N\\d|n}} a_n\right)^2 \leq 2.$$

It is straightforward to use this inequality to prove that $\frac{1}{N/q} \sum_{n\leq N: q|n} a_n - \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n\leq N} a_n$ is small for most $q$ having a bounded number of small prime factors -- meaning $\sum_{q\in S_\epsilon} 1/q \gg_k (\log \log Q)^k$ for every $k\geq 1$. One can probabily push this argument up to $k = \sqrt{\log \log N}$ or so.

Can one go farther, possibly by other means?

Source Link
H A Helfgott
  • 20.2k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 126

Here is an inequality one can in fact prove by the duality principle (Théorème 5 in Bombieri's Le grand crible, ignoring terms with $a\ne 0$):

$$\sum_{q\leq Q} \frac{\mu^2(q)}{q} \left(\frac{1}{N} \sum_{d|q} \mu(d) d \sum_{\substack{n\leq N\\d|n}} a_n\right)^2 \leq 2.$$

It is straightforward to use this inequality to prove that $\frac{1}{N/q} \sum_{n\leq N: q|n} a_n - \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n\leq N} a_n$ is small for most $q$ having a bounded number of small prime factors -- meaning $\sum_{q\in S_\epsilon} 1/q \gg_k (\log \log Q)^k$ for every $k\geq 1$. One can probabily push this argument up to $k = \sqrt{\log \log N}$ or so.