Timeline for Must bounded sequences be well-distributed to most *composite* moduli?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 9 at 16:17 | answer | added | Terry Tao | timeline score: 9 | |
Sep 8 at 18:10 | answer | added | H A Helfgott | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 5 at 17:48 | comment | added | Will Sawin | I undeleted it after fixing a problem (my first version of it didn't give a good bound for $\sum_{q \in S_\epsilon} 1/q$, but this version does.) | |
Sep 5 at 17:39 | comment | added | H A Helfgott | Something like what @WillSawin just posted and deleted should work (in the negative direction) - I was just thinking along the same lines, but I am on top of a Mayan ruin and my girlfriend is telling me to put away my phone. | |
Sep 5 at 17:26 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 6 | |
Sep 5 at 2:53 | answer | added | H A Helfgott | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 5 at 2:46 | comment | added | H A Helfgott | Notes: (a) in (+), $=O(1)$ can be replaced by $\leq 2$. (b) As shown in Lemma 4.6 of vol I of P.D.T.A. Elliott's Probabilistic Number Theory), the statement (with $=O(1)$, not $\leq 2$) is true even for $Q=N$; it is basically the dual of the Turán–Kubilius inequality. (I do not really care about (a) or (b) right now - this is just a side note.) | |
Sep 5 at 2:45 | history | asked | H A Helfgott | CC BY-SA 4.0 |