Timeline for Splitting in triangulated categories
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 16, 2009 at 19:20 | vote | accept | alekzander | ||
Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 | comment | added | alekzander | More precisely, ``if given objects A and B, with zero morphism A->B, can we say that $A\stackrel{0}{\to}B\to A+B$ is a distinguished triangle?'' | |
Nov 10, 2009 at 0:09 | comment | added | alekzander | Well, in my personal register it is. Perhaps along the lines of "if we are given the zero morphism from A to B,...." Sorry for my imprecision. | |
Nov 10, 2009 at 0:08 | history | edited | alekzander | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 19 characters in body
|
Nov 9, 2009 at 23:00 | answer | added | Greg Stevenson | timeline score: 18 | |
Nov 9, 2009 at 22:55 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 9, 2009 at 22:50 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | "If 0:A-->B" is not a sentence, so I don't know what that's supposed to mean. | |
Nov 9, 2009 at 22:35 | history | asked | alekzander | CC BY-SA 2.5 |