Timeline for Generating function for A225114
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10 at 9:50 | answer | added | Dima Pasechnik | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 8 at 21:01 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | OK, so it points at e.g. doi.org/10.2307/2322898 (and to Ramanujan). It seems to be a disconnect in the literature on continued fractions... | |
| Sep 7 at 10:24 | comment | added | Notamathematician | @DimaPasechnik, you can start with OEIS A005169. | |
| Sep 6 at 23:58 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | You have an unusual, in the way it depends on $x$, kind of continued fraction. I could not find anything similar in the literature. Do you have any pointers? | |
| Sep 6 at 18:48 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | @MatrinRubey - you might like this question | |
| Sep 6 at 18:25 | history | edited | Dima Pasechnik |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 6 at 3:42 | comment | added | Notamathematician | @DimaPasechnik, done. | |
| Sep 6 at 3:41 | history | edited | Notamathematician | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 160 characters in body
|
| Sep 5 at 19:11 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | sorry, can you put a complete properly formatted GP script into your question? The line you posted does not output anything for me. | |
| Sep 5 at 12:20 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | It's not a very usual continued fraction. How do you evaluate it, with what software - I suppose you can check it against a lot of entries of $a(n)$ | |
| Sep 4 at 13:23 | history | asked | Notamathematician | CC BY-SA 4.0 |