Timeline for Characterizing the integral as a function of $n$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8 at 17:15 | vote | accept | yfful | ||
| Sep 4 at 19:18 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 4 at 13:50 | comment | added | yfful | Thanks @IosifPinelis for the comment. I think we need more conditions on $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\lambda$. I have editted the question for the regimes of my interest. | |
| Sep 4 at 13:50 | history | edited | yfful | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Sep 4 at 13:13 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | If $\lambda$ is small, then $M:=\max f>2$, and then the integral will behave somewhat like $(1-M)^n$ for large $n$. So, the behavior of the integral will depend very much on $\alpha,\beta,\lambda$. | |
| Sep 4 at 13:01 | history | edited | yfful | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Sep 4 at 12:19 | comment | added | gmvh | Welcome to MO! May I ask where this integral comes from? | |
| S Sep 4 at 12:13 | review | First questions | |||
| Sep 4 at 12:19 | |||||
| S Sep 4 at 12:13 | history | asked | yfful | CC BY-SA 4.0 |