Timeline for Coprime polynomials and polynomial substitution
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8 at 20:02 | vote | accept | Maurizio Barbato | ||
| Sep 6 at 22:46 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title
|
| Sep 6 at 18:41 | answer | added | Alexei Entin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 1 at 11:43 | comment | added | Maurizio Barbato | @W.EdwinClark Dear Edwin, I have found the article in which Cohn established the results you quoted: Cohn P.M, Bezout rings and their subrings. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (1968) 64(2):251-264. doi:10.1017/S0305004100042791. Thank you very much again for your suggestion. | |
| Aug 31 at 13:54 | comment | added | Maurizio Barbato | @W.EdwinClark Thank you very much Edwin for having kindly considered my post. I would be very grateful to you, if you could give me the precise references for these results of Paul Cohn. | |
| Aug 30 at 22:55 | comment | added | W. Edwin Clark | Perhap this remark at inhttps://math.stackexchange.com/questions/412980/kx-1-x-2-dots-is-a-ufd might be useful: Paul Cohn introduced the idea of inert extensions when studying Bezout rings. Cohn proved that every gcd domain can be inertly embedded in a Bezout domain, and every UFD can be inertly embedded in a PID. | |
| Aug 30 at 14:10 | history | asked | Maurizio Barbato | CC BY-SA 4.0 |