Timeline for A question on vanishing of Godement–Jacquet-like zeta integral
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 at 13:49 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
`\operatorname` (including from `\mathop`) and `\lvert\rvert` for spacing around `\det`
|
| Sep 1 at 8:26 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo
|
| Aug 31 at 4:22 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
new guess and new try
|
| Aug 28 at 17:51 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
reorganizing
|
| Aug 28 at 14:25 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
finding some mistake and the correct computation
|
| Aug 28 at 9:28 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
some new idea updated
|
| Aug 28 at 7:02 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
| Aug 27 at 11:51 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Aug 27 at 11:37 | comment | added | Adjoint Functor | Sorry I wrongly post the question on math SE and forgot to delete it. Thank you for your remind. @Kimball | |
| Aug 27 at 10:44 | comment | added | Kimball | Please don't simultaneously cross-post: math.stackexchange.com/q/4963633/11323 | |
| Aug 27 at 9:41 | history | edited | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Aug 27 at 8:36 | history | asked | Adjoint Functor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |