Timeline for Derivative norm estimates
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 3 at 22:08 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Sep 3 at 22:08 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 3 at 16:40 | vote | accept | T. Amdeberhan | ||
| Aug 31 at 19:29 | answer | added | Bazin | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Aug 26 at 21:06 | history | bounty started | T. Amdeberhan | ||
| S Aug 26 at 21:06 | history | notice added | T. Amdeberhan | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Aug 26 at 21:04 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 170 characters in body
|
| Aug 24 at 8:25 | comment | added | Aleksei Kulikov | Well, then can't you just write the gigantic formula for the derivative of the inverse, Faà di Bruno style, I think you will get exactly what you need? | |
| Aug 23 at 22:20 | comment | added | T. Amdeberhan | Take the manifold to be $\mathbb{R}^m$, say. | |
| Aug 23 at 21:50 | comment | added | Aleksei Kulikov | How do you define the norm? Or is your manifold, say, compact? | |
| Aug 23 at 21:04 | history | asked | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |