Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32

Here's the way I'd prove this fact.

Monomorphism $f: S \hookrightarrow M$ in the category of (say, left) $R$-modules is called pure, if one of those equivalent conditions are met:

a) $N \otimes f$ is injective for any right R-module $N$;

b) $f_*: \operatorname{Hom}(C, M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(C, M/S)$ is surjective for any finitely presented left module $C$;

c) $f^+: M^+ \to S^+$ is a split epimorphism, where $(-)^+$ is the duality functor from left to right modules $M \mapsto \operatorname{Hom}_{\Bbb Z}(M, \Bbb Q / \Bbb Z)$.

Now we need three observations, which follow pretty clearly from definitions above.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat. This is because quotient of a flat module by pure submodule is flat by a), and long exact sequence of Tors gives you this.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ via natural inclusion by b) — every morphism from a finitely presented factors through the direct sum.

  3. Product of a pure monomorphisms is a pure monomorphism, by c).

There are a few good excercises on pure modulessubmodules in athe book "Rings of quotients" by Bo Stenström. For a more detailed exposition of "pure homological algebra" one may consult a monograph "Purity, spectra and localisation" my Mike Prest.

Here's the way I'd prove this fact.

Monomorphism $f: S \hookrightarrow M$ in the category of (say, left) $R$-modules is called pure, if one of those equivalent conditions are met:

a) $N \otimes f$ is injective for any right R-module $N$;

b) $f_*: \operatorname{Hom}(C, M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(C, M/S)$ is surjective for any finitely presented left module $C$;

c) $f^+: M^+ \to S^+$ is a split epimorphism, where $(-)^+$ is the duality functor from left to right modules $M \mapsto \operatorname{Hom}_{\Bbb Z}(M, \Bbb Q / \Bbb Z)$.

Now we need three observations, which follow pretty clearly from definitions above.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat. This is because quotient of a flat module by pure submodule is flat by a), and long exact sequence of Tors gives you this.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ via natural inclusion by b) — every morphism from a finitely presented factors through the direct sum.

  3. Product of a pure monomorphisms is a pure monomorphism, by c).

There are a few good excercises on pure modules in a book "Rings of quotients" by Bo Stenström. For a more detailed exposition of "pure homological algebra" one may consult a monograph "Purity, spectra and localisation" my Mike Prest.

Here's the way I'd prove this fact.

Monomorphism $f: S \hookrightarrow M$ in the category of (say, left) $R$-modules is called pure, if one of those equivalent conditions are met:

a) $N \otimes f$ is injective for any right R-module $N$;

b) $f_*: \operatorname{Hom}(C, M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(C, M/S)$ is surjective for any finitely presented left module $C$;

c) $f^+: M^+ \to S^+$ is a split epimorphism, where $(-)^+$ is the duality functor from left to right modules $M \mapsto \operatorname{Hom}_{\Bbb Z}(M, \Bbb Q / \Bbb Z)$.

Now we need three observations, which follow pretty clearly from definitions above.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat. This is because quotient of a flat module by pure submodule is flat by a), and long exact sequence of Tors gives you this.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ via natural inclusion by b) — every morphism from a finitely presented factors through the direct sum.

  3. Product of a pure monomorphisms is a pure monomorphism, by c).

There are a few good excercises on pure submodules in the book "Rings of quotients" by Bo Stenström. For a more detailed exposition of "pure homological algebra" one may consult monograph "Purity, spectra and localisation" my Mike Prest.

rewritten the answer to give a (more) complete argument, improved references
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32

This follows from two pretty general observations.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ (via natural inclusion).

For completeness of an answer, here is a definition of a pure module. Both observations above follow easily from equivalence between two definitions below; this equivalence is a bit tricky toHere's the way I'd prove this fact.

SubmoduleMonomorphism $f: S < M$$f: S \hookrightarrow M$ in the category of a (leftsay, left) module $M$$R$-modules is called pure, if one of those equivalent conditions are met:

a) $N \otimes f$ is injective for any right moduleR-module $N$;

b) $f_*: \operatorname{Hom}(C, M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(C, M/S)$ is surjective for any finitely presented left module $C$.;

I suggestc) $f^+: M^+ \to S^+$ is a split epimorphism, where $(-)^+$ is the duality functor from left to right modules $M \mapsto \operatorname{Hom}_{\Bbb Z}(M, \Bbb Q / \Bbb Z)$.

Now we need three observations, which follow pretty clearly from definitions above.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat. This is because quotient of a flat module by pure submodule is flat by a), and long exact sequence of Tors gives you this.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ via natural inclusion by b) — every morphism from a finitely presented factors through the direct sum.

  3. Product of a pure monomorphisms is a pure monomorphism, by c).

There are a few good excercises on pure modules in a book "Rings of quotients" by Bo Stenström for. For a good introduction to puremore detailed exposition of "pure homological algebraalgebra" one may consult a monograph "Purity, spectra and localisation" my Mike Prest.

This follows from two pretty general observations.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ (via natural inclusion).

For completeness of an answer, here is a definition of a pure module. Both observations above follow easily from equivalence between two definitions below; this equivalence is a bit tricky to prove.

Submodule $f: S < M$ of a (left) module $M$ is called pure, if one of equivalent conditions are met:

a) $N \otimes f$ is injective for any right module $N$;

b) $f_*: \operatorname{Hom}(C, M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(C, M/S)$ is surjective for any finitely presented left module $C$.

I suggest the book "Rings of quotients" by Bo Stenström for a good introduction to pure homological algebra.

Here's the way I'd prove this fact.

Monomorphism $f: S \hookrightarrow M$ in the category of (say, left) $R$-modules is called pure, if one of those equivalent conditions are met:

a) $N \otimes f$ is injective for any right R-module $N$;

b) $f_*: \operatorname{Hom}(C, M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(C, M/S)$ is surjective for any finitely presented left module $C$;

c) $f^+: M^+ \to S^+$ is a split epimorphism, where $(-)^+$ is the duality functor from left to right modules $M \mapsto \operatorname{Hom}_{\Bbb Z}(M, \Bbb Q / \Bbb Z)$.

Now we need three observations, which follow pretty clearly from definitions above.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat. This is because quotient of a flat module by pure submodule is flat by a), and long exact sequence of Tors gives you this.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ via natural inclusion by b) — every morphism from a finitely presented factors through the direct sum.

  3. Product of a pure monomorphisms is a pure monomorphism, by c).

There are a few good excercises on pure modules in a book "Rings of quotients" by Bo Stenström. For a more detailed exposition of "pure homological algebra" one may consult a monograph "Purity, spectra and localisation" my Mike Prest.

Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32

This follows from two pretty general observations.

  1. Pure submodule of a flat module is flat.

  2. $\bigoplus_I A_i$ is a pure submodule of $\prod_I A_i$ (via natural inclusion).

For completeness of an answer, here is a definition of a pure module. Both observations above follow easily from equivalence between two definitions below; this equivalence is a bit tricky to prove.

Submodule $f: S < M$ of a (left) module $M$ is called pure, if one of equivalent conditions are met:

a) $N \otimes f$ is injective for any right module $N$;

b) $f_*: \operatorname{Hom}(C, M) \to \operatorname{Hom}(C, M/S)$ is surjective for any finitely presented left module $C$.

I suggest the book "Rings of quotients" by Bo Stenström for a good introduction to pure homological algebra.