Timeline for Pullback of monomorphisms between selfdual objects in a tensor category
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 7 at 4:34 | history | bounty ended | Sebastien Palcoux | ||
| S Sep 7 at 4:34 | history | notice removed | Sebastien Palcoux | ||
| Sep 7 at 4:34 | vote | accept | Sebastien Palcoux | ||
| Sep 5 at 10:05 | answer | added | Dave Benson | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 5 at 7:41 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added about splitting lemma and Freyd's book
|
| S Sep 5 at 1:42 | history | bounty started | Sebastien Palcoux | ||
| S Sep 5 at 1:42 | history | notice added | Sebastien Palcoux | Draw attention | |
| Sep 4 at 13:40 | comment | added | Sebastien Palcoux | The proof for the semisimple case has now been included. | |
| Sep 4 at 13:38 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
proof of the semisimple case
|
| Aug 23 at 3:18 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
We can only expect P to be selfdual up to isomorphism.
|
| Aug 22 at 20:33 | comment | added | Eric S. | Certainly this should be the case for fusion categories (or more generally, semi-simple tensor categories), since then P is a subobject of the sum of A and B. | |
| Aug 22 at 18:36 | history | asked | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 4.0 |