Timeline for Characterization of normed spaces based on violation of parallelogram law
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14 at 17:12 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Aug 14 at 9:52 | vote | accept | Hikaru | ||
| Aug 14 at 9:45 | comment | added | David Gao | How is this not even stronger (and therefore just inconsistent for any nontrivial space) than your previous assumption? | |
| Aug 14 at 9:44 | history | edited | Hikaru | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Aug 14 at 9:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 19 at 3:05 | |||||
| Aug 14 at 9:36 | comment | added | Hikaru | @EmilJeřábek I added a clarification here. Sorry about the previous draft. | |
| Aug 14 at 9:33 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @EmilJeřábek Yes $x+y=a, x-y=b$ mplies equality | |
| Aug 14 at 9:26 | history | edited | Hikaru | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited for clarity.
|
| Aug 14 at 9:24 | answer | added | Achim Krause | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 14 at 9:21 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | This is equivalent to the full law: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Aug 14 at 9:19 | history | edited | Emil Jeřábek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix TeX
|
| Aug 14 at 9:11 | history | asked | Hikaru | CC BY-SA 4.0 |