Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Oct 25 at 20:09 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Oct 25 at 20:09 history notice removed CommunityBot
Oct 17 at 19:02 comment added ABIM @mlk I fixed this, but I still have not managed to find pertrubation bounds.
S Oct 17 at 18:57 history bounty started ABIM
S Oct 17 at 18:57 history notice added ABIM Authoritative reference needed
Sep 3 at 12:03 history undeleted ABIM
Sep 3 at 12:03 history deleted ABIM via Vote
Aug 15 at 4:13 history undeleted ABIM
Aug 14 at 17:26 history deleted ABIM via Vote
Aug 14 at 15:04 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
removed capitals from title
Aug 14 at 14:13 history edited ABIM CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Aug 14 at 8:40 comment added mlk I don't understand your notation. If $f$ is only defined on the boundary of the unit cube, how can you have $u=f$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$? In any case, the first approach to such a problem would be to take the Fourier transform with respect to $x$, possibly even starting in 1d for simplicity. This gives you a bunch of independent ODEs which can be explicitly solved and will tell you a lot about the behaviour and about what initial and boundary conditions could work.
Aug 14 at 3:27 history edited ABIM CC BY-SA 4.0
added 19 characters in body
Aug 14 at 3:25 comment added ABIM Really I would only want that $u(x,T)=f(x)$ for some smooth function f on $\mathbb{R}^d$, not sure what the boundary condition for the corresponding elliptic problem should be tbh...
Aug 14 at 3:14 comment added Michael Renardy This is too many boundary conditions when $\eta=0$. So as it stands, the problem is not properly formulated.
Aug 14 at 0:21 history edited ABIM CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 259 characters in body
Aug 14 at 0:14 history edited ABIM CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 7 characters in body
Aug 13 at 23:58 history asked ABIM CC BY-SA 4.0