Timeline for A question in Möbius geometry
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9 at 4:04 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Rechtschreibung
|
| Aug 9 at 2:16 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 132 characters in body
|
| Aug 9 at 2:13 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | @Learning: I only said that a decent math book has to contain definitions of all terms used in it. | |
| Aug 8 at 20:10 | comment | added | Yousuf Soliman | I couldn't agree more with this answer; the implicit restriction by many to the group of oriented Möbius transformations can cause some annoying confusion. | |
| Aug 8 at 15:52 | comment | added | Learning | The book is discussing about Möbius sphere geometry and according to the book, I think $1/\bar{z}$ is in the Möbius group. In some other books, I have seen that the Möbius group for is isomorphic to $O(n+1,1)/\{I,-I\}$ for $n$ dimensional sphere geometry. And in some books authors do not consider the function $1/\bar{z}$. This confused me. | |
| Aug 8 at 13:31 | history | answered | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |