Let $\overline{M}_{g,n}(X,\beta)$ be the moduli of stable maps into $X$ of class $\beta \in H_2(X)$. We have the evaluation maps $\operatorname{ev}_i : \overline{M}\_{g,n}(X,\beta) \to X$. Given $\alpha_i \in H^\ast(X)$, the Gromov-Witten invariant corresponding to the tuple $(X,\beta,g,n,\alpha_i)$ is the integral $$\int_{[\overline{M}_{g,n}(X,\beta)]^\text{vir}}\bigwedge_i \operatorname{ev}_i^\ast(\alpha_i).$$
There is also the "forgetful" map (or "stabilization" map) $F : \overline{M}_{g,n}(X,\beta) \to \overline{M}\_{g,n}$. I don't know if this is the standard terminology (is it?), but one can define the Gromov-Witten class corresponding to the tuple $(X,\beta,g,n,\alpha_i)$ to be the (virtual) pushforward $$F_\ast\left(\bigwedge_i \operatorname{ev}_i^\ast(\alpha_i)\right) \in H^\ast(\overline{M}_{g,n}).$$$$F_\ast^\text{vir}\left(\bigwedge_i \operatorname{ev}_i^\ast(\alpha_i)\right) \in H^\ast(\overline{M}_{g,n}).$$
Question: Are there any nontrivial cases in which these Gromov-Witten classes have been identified explicitly, e.g., in terms of say tautological classes on $\overline{M}_{g,n}$?
Question: Are there any nontrivial casesJust as a very naive motivation, note that in which thesemany situations Gromov-Witten classes have been identified explicitlyinvariants are zero simply because of "stupid reasons", elike degree/dimension reasons (i.ge., in terms the degree of say tautological classes ($\psi$ classes and $\kappa$ classesthe integrand doesn't match the virtual dimension) on, and so provide no information. But the Gromov-Witten $\overline{M}_{g,n}$?classes may still be nonzero and contain some information.