Timeline for Can the trace be computed in any Schauder basis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4 at 14:19 | comment | added | Antonius | You might want to look at G.L. Litvinov, "On the traces of linear operators in locally convex spaces" Sel. Math. Sovietia , 8 : 3 (1989) pp. 203–212 Trudy Sem. Vekt. i Tenz. Anal. , 19 (1979) pp. 243–272 | |
| Aug 3 at 0:20 | history | edited | WillG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Aug 2 at 17:27 | history | edited | WillG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Aug 2 at 16:16 | comment | added | WillG | @Nandor I have edited the post to clarify what I mean by $\pi_n$. The formula I have given is then just the trace formula in the finite-dimensional case (extended to Schauder bases), no? | |
| Aug 2 at 16:14 | history | edited | WillG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 84 characters in body
|
| Aug 2 at 16:08 | comment | added | Antonius | Which kind of projection do you mean? Orthogonal? Or with respect to the given basis? Next, your formula looks weird, as the trace is a number and the projection must be vector-valued, hence the right hand side is a vector. | |
| Aug 2 at 15:32 | history | asked | WillG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |