Timeline for Can adjoint linear transformations be naturally realized as adjoint functors?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2017 at 22:07 | answer | added | Mike Shulman | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 6, 2010 at 18:52 | answer | added | Chris Heunen | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jan 3, 2010 at 21:19 | answer | added | Mike Shulman | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 3, 2010 at 6:44 | answer | added | Kevin Walker | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 2, 2010 at 1:30 | comment | added | SixWingedSeraph | " I guess we want the category to be additive and the biproduct to be vector addition, but I have no idea whether this actually happens." Make it happen! Mod out the the messy part so you get what you want. This works remarkably often. Of course, sometimes it gives you the trivial object... | |
| Jan 2, 2010 at 0:11 | answer | added | Martin Brandenburg | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 14, 2009 at 18:21 | history | edited | Ben Webster♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 14, 2009 at 17:17 | history | edited | S. Carnahan♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 14, 2009 at 7:45 | answer | added | Andrew Critch | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 14, 2009 at 5:01 | vote | accept | Qiaochu Yuan | ||
| Oct 14, 2009 at 3:31 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 12 | |
| Oct 14, 2009 at 3:18 | history | asked | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |