Timeline for Boundary value of Sobolev space
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18 at 1:47 | comment | added | TaQ | @GiorgioMetafune I made an unimportant edit to see whether you can now revert your downvote. | |
| Aug 18 at 1:46 | history | edited | TaQ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Aug 17 at 6:30 | comment | added | Giorgio Metafune | Yes, exactly. If I try to revert my vote, the system says that I cannot do until the post has been reedited. | |
| Aug 17 at 3:36 | comment | added | TaQ | Indeed, I tried some downvoting, and it seems that there is something strange in the system: If I first downvote gerw's answer, it gets 0 votes, and if I then revert it, it gets 2 votes. Now there seems to be 0 since I didn't want it get 2 as he/she didn't clarify the answer when I requested. | |
| Aug 17 at 3:21 | comment | added | TaQ | @GiorgioMetafune I do not quite understand your comment; do you intend to mean that you unintentionally downvoted my answer and that you cannot (for what reason?) revert your downvote unless I somehow edit my answer? | |
| Aug 15 at 17:55 | comment | added | Giorgio Metafune | For strange reasons I see that I downvoted...I do not know why, probably I just pressed the wrong key. If you make some change, I can change, too. Sorry | |
| Jul 28 at 6:35 | comment | added | Daniele Tampieri | I apologize for the edit. I just found strange the notations for the sequences (and I admit this is somewhat arbitrary) and I found not understandable the notation for the mapping (and this is still now my opinion). Said that I think there's no need to comment anymore, just revert the edit (as you've already done). | |
| Jul 27 at 19:33 | history | rollback | TaQ |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Jul 27 at 19:26 | comment | added | TaQ | @DanieleTampieri : Vai did you change my notation? Everything there was intentional. Did you find some mathematical error? You have now wasted one of the possible 10 edits before the post goes "cw", if the convention is still the same as earlier. | |
| Jul 27 at 19:04 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor formatting and Math Jaxing
|
| Jul 27 at 18:19 | history | answered | TaQ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |