Timeline for On a sentence of J.Nekovar in the introduction of "Selmer complexes"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26 at 4:16 | comment | added | Marsault Chabat | Oh I found it @coLaideronnette it allows us to connect the Greenberg Selmer group and that of Bloch-Kato'! It's really enlightening, thank you very much! | |
| Jul 26 at 2:16 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Missing period; link to comment
|
| Jul 26 at 2:05 | history | edited | Marsault Chabat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 194 characters in body
|
| Jul 26 at 2:03 | comment | added | Marsault Chabat | No but wait @ChrisWuthrich, I agreed to quickly. Indeed, the elementary methods are those used in the book but my question (which was not clear enough so I will edit it) is why Greenberg's conditions are the only ones to which these methods apply. | |
| Jul 26 at 1:52 | comment | added | Marsault Chabat | @coLaideronnette thank you very much, but could you be a little bit more precise, where do you think I might find an answer in this paper? | |
| Jul 26 at 1:51 | comment | added | Marsault Chabat | @ChrisWuthrich Yes you right this was obvious but the second question is less obvious I think. | |
| Jul 26 at 0:11 | comment | added | coLaideronnette | See arxiv.org/pdf/1404.7386 | |
| Jul 25 at 12:35 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | I think the "elementary methods" refer to the content of the book itself. Nekovář uses the local conditions at places above $p$ to be the Greenberg conditions. I don't know what $p$-adic Hodge theory was/is missing to replace them by $H_f$ conditions in general. | |
| Jul 25 at 5:19 | history | edited | Jukka Kohonen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo
|
| Jul 25 at 4:40 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor formatting
|
| Jul 25 at 4:04 | history | asked | Marsault Chabat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |