Timeline for Convergence in $\mathbb{L}_1$ implies convergence "perturbed" conditional expectations
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16 at 15:54 | comment | added | unwissen | @GrandesJorasses Sorry, this was just a typo which is now corrected. About your more specialised statement I would have to think first. | |
| Jul 16 at 15:49 | history | edited | unwissen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jul 16 at 15:47 | comment | added | Grandes Jorasses | But the weights do not sum up to 1, or do I misunderstand something? So they are not conditional densities in the first place. In any case, I was indeed trying to work out the in which the $\beta$ coefficients lie in a bounded set. I think the statement is true if $XxY$ is a compact set in $\mathbb{R}^2$ by the uniqueness representation theorem of mixtures of normals. Thank you very much for your help in any case! | |
| Jul 16 at 14:48 | history | answered | unwissen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |