Timeline for A question on Borel measurability
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 11 at 4:39 | history | edited | Tobias Fritz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved the statements
|
S Jul 11 at 4:39 | history | suggested | user532086 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved the statements
|
Jul 10 at 17:19 | answer | added | David Gao | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 10 at 17:12 | comment | added | David Gao | @TobiasFritz $\tau$ may not even be well-defined in that case, since there’s no reason $\{x \in X: \pi(x) = y\}$ is measurable. | |
Jul 10 at 13:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 11 at 4:39 | |||||
Jul 10 at 13:06 | comment | added | Tobias Fritz | Without further conditions, aren't there easy counterexamples obtained by equipping $Y = \{0,1\}$ with the indiscrete $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{B}_Y = \{\emptyset, Y\}$? Like this, every surjective $\pi$ is measurable, but $\tau$ is not unless it's constant. | |
Jul 10 at 12:46 | history | edited | bobscott | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 43 characters in body; edited tags
|
S Jul 10 at 12:43 | review | First questions | |||
Jul 10 at 16:07 | |||||
S Jul 10 at 12:43 | history | asked | bobscott | CC BY-SA 4.0 |