Skip to main content
Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
added 17 characters in body
Source Link
cellular
  • 855
  • 6
  • 13

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Motivation: I came to this question after reading a paper about the universal localization property of non connective algebraic $K$-theory. So the question can be formulated as follows is a pretriàgulatedpretriangulated category (with involution) has a vanishing k$K$-theory does all other localizing functors such as Witt spectrum vanishes.

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Motivation: I came to this question after reading a paper about localization property of non connective algebraic $K$-theory. So the question can be formulated as follows is a pretriàgulated category (with involution) has a vanishing k-theory does all other localizing functors such as Witt spectrum vanishes.

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Motivation: I came to this question after reading a paper about the universal localization property of non connective algebraic $K$-theory. So the question can be formulated as follows is a pretriangulated category (with involution) has a vanishing $K$-theory does all other localizing functors such as Witt spectrum vanishes.

added 318 characters in body
Source Link
cellular
  • 855
  • 6
  • 13

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Motivation: I came to this question after reading a paper about localization property of non connective algebraic $K$-theory. So the question can be formulated as follows is a pretriàgulated category (with involution) has a vanishing k-theory does all other localizing functors such as Witt spectrum vanishes.

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Motivation: I came to this question after reading a paper about localization property of non connective algebraic $K$-theory. So the question can be formulated as follows is a pretriàgulated category (with involution) has a vanishing k-theory does all other localizing functors such as Witt spectrum vanishes.

Notice added Authoritative reference needed by cellular
Bounty Started worth 200 reputation by cellular
added 264 characters in body
Source Link
cellular
  • 855
  • 6
  • 13

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Let $S$ be a ring with involution (with 2 invertible). Suppose that the non connective algebraic K-theory $K(S)$ is 0 (i.e. $K_{n}(S)=0$, for all $n$).

Can we say something about the (higher) Witt groups $W_{n}(S)$ ?

Edit: I was wondering if this kind of questions is tractable in general? What kind of articles or books can be recommended to have some insight about these questions? I will be grateful to any indication. Thank you in advance for any help in this direction.

Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by cellular
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by cellular
Consistent TeX
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69
Loading
Source Link
cellular
  • 855
  • 6
  • 13
Loading