Timeline for Poincaré-Wirtinger inequality for more general "means"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9 at 10:24 | comment | added | tommy1996q | @Hannes unwissen thanks. Especially Ziemer's book goes in great detail, in a very general setting. Actually, I edited the question since I got carried away asking a question way more general than what I really need. Hope that in the simplified case presented there is a more explicit answer. It might be possible to recover it by going through Ziemer's book, but I am not 100% sure | |
| Jul 9 at 10:21 | history | edited | tommy1996q | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 887 characters in body
|
| Jul 8 at 11:42 | comment | added | Hannes | It also follows from Theorem 4.2.1 in Ziemer's Weakly differentiable functions which has a whole (and very nice) chapter dedicated to Poincare-type inequalities. (Maybe it is the same theorem as in Lieb-Loss, which I do not have access to right now, if so, then disregard this comment.) | |
| Jul 7 at 21:59 | comment | added | unwissen | Yes, this is e.g. included in Theorem 8.11 of Lieb-Loss Analysis. | |
| Jul 7 at 21:17 | history | asked | tommy1996q | CC BY-SA 4.0 |