Timeline for Proper Latin sub-squares of generalized Latin squares
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9 at 13:01 | comment | added | Ian Wanless | Indeed, I goofed (rushed my reply). Have now edited the original post, with my next attempt at counterexamples. | |
| Jul 9 at 12:59 | history | edited | Ian Wanless | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 124 characters in body
|
| Jul 4 at 16:03 | history | edited | Ian Wanless | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 820 characters in body
|
| Jul 4 at 14:47 | comment | added | Richard Stanley | @Ian Wanless: your $F$ looks like a Latin square to me. This is the case $b=1$. Every $a\times a$ Latin square certainly contains an $a\times a$ Latin square, namely, itself. | |
| Jul 4 at 13:23 | history | answered | Ian Wanless | CC BY-SA 4.0 |