Skip to main content
added 27 characters in body
Source Link
Bugs Bunny
  • 12.3k
  • 1
  • 30
  • 65

My guess that it should not be possible because $SL_2(R)$ would not have a 3-soluble nonnilpotent subgroup. I am not sure whether it is true that any soluble non-nilpotent subgroup would lie in Borel subgroup but I imagine that this is right...

My guess that it should not be possible because $SL_2(R)$ would not have a 3-soluble subgroup. I am not sure whether it is true that any soluble subgroup would lie in Borel subgroup but I imagine that this is right...

My guess that it should not be possible because $SL_2(R)$ would not have a 3-soluble nonnilpotent subgroup. I am not sure whether it is true that any soluble non-nilpotent subgroup would lie in Borel subgroup but I imagine that this is right...

Source Link
Bugs Bunny
  • 12.3k
  • 1
  • 30
  • 65

My guess that it should not be possible because $SL_2(R)$ would not have a 3-soluble subgroup. I am not sure whether it is true that any soluble subgroup would lie in Borel subgroup but I imagine that this is right...