Timeline for Extending diffeomorphisms between surfaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26 at 11:47 | vote | accept | LDLSS | ||
| Jun 26 at 11:47 | vote | accept | LDLSS | ||
| Jun 26 at 11:47 | |||||
| Jun 26 at 9:53 | comment | added | Andy Putman | (I edited my answer to make this explicit) | |
| Jun 26 at 9:53 | history | edited | Andy Putman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 303 characters in body
|
| Jun 26 at 9:36 | comment | added | Andy Putman | @LDLSS: When I said that you identify the two surfaces with $M$, I meant that you do so in a way that reflects the identifications of the boundary components of the $M_i$ given by your maps. | |
| Jun 26 at 9:24 | comment | added | LDLSS | Thank you for your detailed explanation. However, I am concerned about the assumption that $f_0$ does not map one boundary component to a different boundary component, unless the initial diffeomorphism (your second sentences) preserves each boundary component separately. | |
| Jun 26 at 7:55 | history | edited | Andy Putman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 816 characters in body
|
| Jun 26 at 7:25 | history | answered | Andy Putman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |