Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 25 at 11:05 answer added Adam Přenosil timeline score: 2
Jun 25 at 9:59 history edited YCor
edited tags
Jun 25 at 9:40 answer added Tim Porter timeline score: 2
Jun 25 at 9:36 history became hot network question
Jun 25 at 6:13 comment added Tim Porter I would expect the main question is 'what does 'right' mean in this context? Using the analogy with groups and then asking that somehow relation algebras should show the same behaviour seems a bit strange. Have you looked at the uses of relation algebras eg in the algebraic semantics of modal logics (cf article by Goldblatt, (2000) Algebraic Polymodal Logic: A Survey). There are lots of varieties of relational algebras which relate to well known relational structures and logics. I am not sure if that might go some way to answering your problem.
Jun 25 at 3:59 answer added Qiaochu Yuan timeline score: 4
Jun 25 at 2:44 comment added Joshua Grochow Oh yeah, sorry, silly mistake on my part. I suppose one could ask if, e.g., RA is the variety containing RRA and with a finite equational axiomatization where that finite equational axiomatization is as short as possible (by some metric - number of axioms, numbers of characters, Kolmogorov complexity, ...), but that seems much harder to establish, if true.
Jun 25 at 2:41 comment added Qiaochu Yuan @Joshua: can't you always make it smaller by adding any axiom in RRA that isn't in RA?
Jun 25 at 2:38 comment added Joshua Grochow Is RA the smallest variety containing RRA and with a finite equational characterization? That wouldn't answer your question as stated, but, if true, could be taken as a different kind of evidence that these axioms are "the right ones".
Jun 25 at 2:24 answer added Keith Kearnes timeline score: 7
Jun 25 at 1:34 history asked Noah Schweber CC BY-SA 4.0