Timeline for My category is rigid: what this implies for representation theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19 at 11:58 | comment | added | jg1896 | @R.vanDobbendeBruyn I am asking myself if some proof or result we have for our modules would be simplified by invoking the fact that the category is rigid | |
| Jun 18 at 20:50 | comment | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | What do you mean 'consequences [...] for representation theory'? Rigidity is itself a property of the category of representations, isn't it? What exactly are you looking for? | |
| Jun 18 at 15:04 | comment | added | Ben | Are you working over a field? If so look up Tannakian categories. | |
| Jun 18 at 14:43 | history | asked | jg1896 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |