Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jun 30 at 9:04 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Jun 30 at 9:04 history notice removed CommunityBot
Jun 25 at 9:07 comment added Anacardium @VítTuček$:$ Exactly! You have rightly pointed it out. The Bergman space is decomposed into the orthogonal direct sum of its symmetric and anti-symmetric part. Sorry for the late reply.
Jun 24 at 18:17 comment added Vít Tuček So, strictly speaking, no anti-symmetric functions are not the set theoretic complement of the symmetric functions. :) But I think that there is orthogonal decomposition of $L^2(\mathbb{D})$ into symmetric and anti-symmetric functions (sending $f$ to the pair $(1/2[f(a,b) + f(b,a)], 1/2[f(a,b)-f(b,a)]$). Is that your setting?
Jun 24 at 5:05 comment added Anacardium @VítTuček$:$ Yes. More precisely $f$ Is anti-symmetric on $\mathbb D^2$ if $f(z_1,z_2) = - f(z_2,z_1),$ for all $(z_1,z_2) \in \mathbb D^2.$
Jun 23 at 22:40 comment added Vít Tuček So anti-symmetric functions are all those which are not symmetric?
Jun 23 at 6:05 comment added Anacardium @VítTuček$:$ Symmetric functions are those which are invariant under the $S_2$-action on $\mathbb A^2 \left (\mathbb D^2 \right)$ and anti-symmetric functions are those that are altered according to the permutations of $S_2.$
Jun 22 at 21:45 comment added Vít Tuček Please define symmetric and anti-symmetric functions.
S Jun 22 at 7:16 history bounty started Anacardium
S Jun 22 at 7:16 history notice added Anacardium Authoritative reference needed
Jun 15 at 20:45 history asked Anacardium CC BY-SA 4.0