Timeline for Must strange sequences wear Russellian socks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 6 at 21:07 | comment | added | Alex Kruckman | Nice argument, thanks! | |
Jun 6 at 20:44 | comment | added | Elliot Glazer | We’ll justify $3 \rightarrow 1$ by the contrapositive. Fix $s \in \prod A_i.$ Identify $\bigsqcup A_i \setminus \{s_j: j<\omega\}$ with $\{t \in \prod A_i: \exists ! j (s_j \neq t_j)\}.$ The latter injects into $\mathbb{R}$ and is thus orderable. | |
Jun 6 at 19:09 | comment | added | Alex Kruckman | Can you explain why $|\prod A_i|=|\mathbb{R}|$ implies $\bigsqcup A_i$ countable? | |
Jun 6 at 13:34 | vote | accept | Noah Schweber | ||
Jun 6 at 10:11 | history | edited | Elliot Glazer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
Jun 6 at 10:05 | history | answered | Elliot Glazer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |