Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 1 at 16:47 vote accept The potato eater
May 31 at 20:55 comment added Carlo Beenakker @MichaelHardy --- for $k=2$ I found such a real path-connected solution; I posted it in the answer boxk, it is not simple...
May 31 at 20:41 history edited Carlo Beenakker CC BY-SA 4.0
edited to allow an upvote
May 31 at 20:40 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 3
May 31 at 19:31 comment added Michael Hardy I've deleted my earlier comment where $n$ appeared where $n/2$ was needed.
May 31 at 19:29 comment added Michael Hardy Is the set of $k$-tuples of complex numbers satisfying the proposed equality path-connected? If so, $f_1,\ldots,f_k$ could be non-constant functions of a real variable satisfying this equality.
May 31 at 19:26 comment added Michael Hardy @CarloBeenakker : I put those two numbers you suggested into WolframAlpha and it works! Maybe you should post an answer.
May 31 at 19:18 comment added Michael Hardy $\mathbf{ERRATUM:}$ It seems I wrote $(-1)^n$ where I needed $(-1)^{n/2}$ (since $n$ is even). $$ \begin{align} & \cos\sum_{i=1}^k y_i \\ {} \\ = {} & \sum_{\text{even } n\,\ge\,0} (-1)^{n/2} \sum_{I \,\subseteq\,\{\,1,\,\ldots\,,\,k\,\} \\ \quad |I|\,=\,n} \,\,\,\prod_{i\,\in\,I} \sin y_i \prod_{i\,\notin\,I} \cos y_i. \end{align} $$
May 31 at 10:33 comment added Carlo Beenakker you need complex $f_i$ to satisfy the equality; for example, $k=2$, $f_1=-1.173 + 2.047 \,i$, $f_2=0.213 + 0.108 \,i$.
May 30 at 22:13 comment added The potato eater Not easy to equate this sum to this product but maybe possible. Just asking because my other question kinda ties to it. If so maybe there is simple expression for the zeta function I'm half plane. I'm sure we can tweak it a bit and add denominator to the cosine.
May 30 at 21:59 comment added Michael Hardy If there is a sequence $y_1,\ldots,y_k$ of non-zero NUMBERS for which $$ \sum_{i=1}^k \cos(y_i)= \cos\left(\sum_{i=1}^k y_i \right) $$ then there is a sequence of non-zero FUNCTIONS satisfying that equality, since each function $f_i$ could be constantly equal to $y_i. \qquad$
May 30 at 21:47 history edited The potato eater CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
May 30 at 21:46 history edited Michael Hardy CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body; edited title
May 30 at 21:45 history asked The potato eater CC BY-SA 4.0