Timeline for Hard problems with an easy-to-understand answer
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10 at 20:16 | answer | added | Michael Hardy | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 30 at 4:13 | answer | added | Lucenaposition | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 5 at 2:48 | history | edited | Timothy Chow | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added links and additional information
|
| Jun 5 at 2:41 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | Related: Quick proofs of hard theorems. | |
| Jun 2 at 17:13 | answer | added | Timothy Chow | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jun 1 at 6:15 | answer | added | Gerry Myerson | timeline score: 14 | |
| May 31 at 22:50 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| May 31 at 17:33 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 24 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 31 at 13:03 | history | reopened |
Gerry Myerson Dattier Andrés E. Caicedo Brian Hopkins Daniele Tampieri |
||
| May 31 at 9:44 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 31 at 13:03 | |||||
| May 29 at 11:25 | history | left closed in review |
Alex M. Mikhail Katz Michael Albanese |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| May 29 at 7:25 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | This question has been closed as not being about research-level mathematics. I think the answers that have been posted (by me, but, still), one concerning the existence of orthogonal Latin squares, the other concerning a Diophantine equation associated to Euler, are indisputably about research-level mathematics, and that means the question is about research-level mathematics. Please vote to reopen (I have another answer I'd like to post!). | |
| May 29 at 7:18 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 29 at 11:25 | |||||
| May 29 at 5:18 | history | closed |
Sam Hopkins Andy Putman abx Benjamin Steinberg Max Alekseyev |
Not suitable for this site | |
| May 28 at 4:17 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I don't suppose there's a ten-line proof of PRIMES is in $P$, nor of the irrationality of $\zeta(3)$, but they are both longstanding problems that were settled using mathematics at a surprisingly elementary level. One might add Mihǎilescu's proof of Catalan's conjecture. | |
| May 28 at 4:13 | answer | added | Gerry Myerson | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 28 at 4:06 | answer | added | Gerry Myerson | timeline score: 15 | |
| May 27 at 17:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 29 at 5:19 | |||||
| May 27 at 16:58 | comment | added | Dattier | Le lien est mort : richardpmann.com/beggar-my-neighbour-records.html | |
| May 27 at 16:52 | comment | added | Martin Hairer | @Dattier Since it presumably fits in less than 10 lines, you should probably just give Launay's example rather than ask people to go and watch a YouTube video... | |
| May 27 at 16:44 | history | asked | Dattier | CC BY-SA 4.0 |