Timeline for How to settle the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis when there are urelements?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 27 at 14:14 | vote | accept | Zuhair Al-Johar | ||
May 27 at 14:00 | comment | added | Zuhair Al-Johar | @TimothyChow, OK good suggestion. Thanks | |
May 27 at 13:39 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | @ZuhairAl-Johar If you have a materially different question from the one you originally posed, then the etiquette is that you create a new MO question, rather than edit your question, which can make it seem that the correct answers to your original question are wrong or misguided. | |
May 26 at 19:46 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Ah, OK, in that case I've lost interest... | |
May 26 at 17:49 | comment | added | Zuhair Al-Johar | I've edited the question to meet the original intention that motivated it. | |
May 26 at 17:40 | comment | added | Zuhair Al-Johar | In reality the original question I had in mind was in relation to ZCA where I thought this incomparability can occur. Anyhow I think the underlying ZFA theory for FM permutation models have a replacement schema so the question might not be relevant to them. But anyhow. How can we prove matters in the setting of ZCA or even in ZFCA but with forbidding impure to pure replacement. I mean those I think can permit such incomparabilities, so how to settle such questions in these contexts. That's the essence of the question really. | |
May 26 at 17:34 | vote | accept | Zuhair Al-Johar | ||
May 26 at 17:49 | |||||
May 26 at 14:05 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
May 26 at 13:48 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |