Timeline for nowhere vanishing vector field on a manifold
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2018 at 13:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Dec 13, 2018 at 14:40 | |||||
| Nov 25, 2010 at 11:57 | vote | accept | Pengfei | ||
| Nov 25, 2010 at 11:00 | answer | added | Noz | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 25, 2010 at 9:50 | answer | added | rpotrie | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 25, 2010 at 6:47 | history | edited | Pengfei | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Nov 25, 2010 at 6:41 | history | edited | Pengfei | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
improved formatting
|
| Nov 25, 2010 at 1:26 | answer | added | Kevin H. Lin | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 24, 2010 at 18:08 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | Regarding your question (1), yes. That's what I'm saying. The covering space argument is one way to approach this. Re (2) that is an if and only if $\chi M =0$, where I use $\chi M$ as shorthand for the Euler characteristic. This is of course assuming $M$ is connected. | |
| Nov 24, 2010 at 14:29 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 24, 2010 at 8:55 | history | edited | Pengfei | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
improved formatting
|
| Nov 24, 2010 at 3:11 | answer | added | Ryan Budney | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 24, 2010 at 1:42 | history | asked | Pengfei | CC BY-SA 2.5 |