Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 28 at 2:06 vote accept Marco Ripà
May 23 at 16:19 answer added John Omielan timeline score: 2
May 21 at 1:22 comment added LSpice Re, OK, I have changed "assume" to "define".
May 21 at 1:22 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Assume -> define
May 21 at 0:48 comment added Marco Ripà P.S. Feel free to edit the first line of text accordingly :)
May 21 at 0:42 comment added Marco Ripà @LSpice Basically, I just need a compact way to write a tetration, we have the power tower a^a^...^a b-times and I invoke the standard definition of integer tetration by ruling out the base case b=1 since we are excluding it by hypothesis (otherwise we would find infinite solutions to the given congruence relation - and even if we improve the stated constraint -, such as 51, 57, 101, and so on).
May 20 at 23:20 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
TeX
May 20 at 23:17 comment added LSpice Is your sentence "Assume …" actually a definition of $^b a$, rather than an assumption about it? If not, then what is the definition?
May 20 at 22:12 comment added Marco Ripà P.S. Here we are clearly assuming radix-10, just let me know if it is worth including this info in the text.
May 20 at 21:46 comment added Marco Ripà I've just removed the redundant statement "10 $\nmid a$" at the beginning since it is trivial to point out that there can't be any multiple of $10$ satisfying the given congruence even if we include the $b=1$ case. I stated the aforementioned condition since this result comes from my research focused on the "congruence speed" of the integer tetration in radix-$10$, where every multiple of $10$ is not characterized by the constant congruence speed property, which involves all the other tetration bases.
May 20 at 21:35 history edited Marco Ripà CC BY-SA 4.0
Removing redundant Hp.
May 20 at 21:21 history edited Marco Ripà CC BY-SA 4.0
typo if-->it
May 20 at 21:04 history asked Marco Ripà CC BY-SA 4.0