Timeline for Differing monoidal model structures on a fixed model category
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14 at 21:04 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 14 at 19:34 | answer | added | Tim Campion | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 14 at 19:29 | vote | accept | JD1874 | ||
| May 14 at 19:26 | comment | added | Tim Campion | @ConnorMalin Disjoint union doesn’t preserve colimits in each variable separately. For instance $X \amalg (-)$ doesn’t preserve the initial object. | |
| May 14 at 18:10 | answer | added | user509184 | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 14 at 14:29 | comment | added | Connor Malin | Take the model structure on $\mathrm{Set}$ with weak equivalences given by isomorphisms and (co)fibrations anything. Then surely, disjoint union and cartesian product give an example? | |
| May 14 at 13:38 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
a typo in the title
|
| May 14 at 13:33 | comment | added | Dave Benson | How about chain complexes of modules over an elementary abelian $p$-group, and over a $p$-restricted Lie algebra with zero bracket and zero restriction map, and of the same rank? | |
| May 14 at 13:12 | comment | added | David White | Yes, I know an example. If you are in Glasgow and interested in this kind of thing, you should email me. I'll be in Glasgow in June and happy to get a cup of coffee with you. Also, if you email me, I'll be happy to share the example I know. Nice to know others are interested in this kind of thing! | |
| S May 14 at 12:59 | review | First questions | |||
| May 14 at 13:36 | |||||
| S May 14 at 12:59 | history | asked | JD1874 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |