Timeline for Error in an argument using spectral theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13 at 11:42 | history | edited | kaleidoscop | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
updated in view of the comments
|
May 13 at 11:38 | comment | added | kaleidoscop | Right, probably the fastest way, thanks | |
May 13 at 11:20 | comment | added | Wojowu | An easy way to see this sequence is not periodic is that the density of $k$ for which $\xi(k)=1$ is equal to $1/\sqrt{2}$. | |
May 13 at 9:42 | history | edited | kaleidoscop | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
missing words
|
May 13 at 9:41 | comment | added | kaleidoscop | Thanks, I expected that. I am not a specialist of spectral theory and I would really need to understand how I use it wrong here. | |
May 13 at 9:32 | comment | added | Carl-Fredrik Nyberg Brodda | No, this is a Sturmian word (in your example, the word is the fixed point of the morphism $0 \mapsto 1$ and $1 \mapsto 110$), and Sturmian words are not periodic, see e.g. Lothaire's book. Note that for $Z = \varphi \mathbb{Z}$, where $\varphi$ is the golden ratio, you get the famous Fibonacci word. | |
May 13 at 9:20 | history | edited | kaleidoscop | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified what i expect in the answer
|
May 13 at 8:37 | history | asked | kaleidoscop | CC BY-SA 4.0 |