Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
added 20 characters in body
Source Link

Consider ZFC with both powerset and infinity removed and collection and $\in$-induction included. The well-ordering principle is not assumed.

Does this theory prove that, for every set $X$, there is a set of all finite subsets of $X$?

Consider ZFC with both powerset and infinity removed and collection included. The well-ordering principle is not assumed.

Does this theory prove that, for every set $X$, there is a set of all finite subsets of $X$?

Consider ZFC with both powerset and infinity removed and collection and $\in$-induction included. The well-ordering principle is not assumed.

Does this theory prove that, for every set $X$, there is a set of all finite subsets of $X$?

formatting, added tag
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Existence of Finite Powersetfinite powerset

Consider ZFC with both Powersetpowerset and Infinityinfinity removed and Collectioncollection included. The Wellwell-Ordering Principleordering principle is not assumed.

Does this theory prove that, for every set $X$, there is a set of all finite subsets of $X$?

Existence of Finite Powerset

Consider ZFC with both Powerset and Infinity removed and Collection included. The Well-Ordering Principle is not assumed.

Does this theory prove that, for every set $X$, there is a set of all finite subsets of $X$?

Existence of finite powerset

Consider ZFC with both powerset and infinity removed and collection included. The well-ordering principle is not assumed.

Does this theory prove that, for every set $X$, there is a set of all finite subsets of $X$?

Source Link

Existence of Finite Powerset

Consider ZFC with both Powerset and Infinity removed and Collection included. The Well-Ordering Principle is not assumed.

Does this theory prove that, for every set $X$, there is a set of all finite subsets of $X$?