Timeline for Every abelian group can be embedded into a ring [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 11 at 14:17 | history | closed |
Jeremy Rickard Sam Hopkins abx Todd Trimble |
Not suitable for this site | |
May 11 at 13:40 | review | Close votes | |||
May 11 at 14:18 | |||||
May 11 at 13:26 | vote | accept | Ândson josé | ||
May 11 at 13:24 | answer | added | Kenta Suzuki | timeline score: 6 | |
May 11 at 13:24 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | See mathoverflow.net/questions/80227/… | |
May 11 at 13:21 | history | edited | Ândson josé | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
May 11 at 13:20 | comment | added | Ândson josé | but in this case, the ring will not have a unity | |
May 11 at 13:19 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | Can’t you just define the multiplication to be trivial ($xy=0$ for all $x,y \in G$)? | |
May 11 at 13:15 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
May 11 at 12:59 | history | asked | Ândson josé | CC BY-SA 4.0 |