Timeline for On centrally symmetric convex figures on the hyperbolic plane
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8 at 16:53 | comment | added | Nandakumar R | Thank you again. And I think the nice thing about this argument is its independence from whether the plane is euclidean or otherwise. | |
| May 8 at 7:29 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | I hope that the answer covers both parts | |
| May 8 at 7:29 | history | edited | Fedor Petrov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| May 8 at 7:01 | history | edited | Fedor Petrov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
| May 8 at 3:49 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | "only if" part is rather clear. For a symmetric regions bisectors pass through a center of symmetry | |
| May 8 at 3:42 | comment | added | Nandakumar R | Thanks. As far as I can make out, this argument also settles the claims in the euclidean case as well and can replace the two proofs at mathoverflow.net/questions/448712/…. What does the phrase "if part is rather clear" mean? | |
| May 8 at 3:39 | vote | accept | Nandakumar R | ||
| May 7 at 21:29 | history | answered | Fedor Petrov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |