Timeline for Harmonic functions and monotonic decay
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30 at 8:54 | vote | accept | HtmlProg | ||
| Apr 30 at 8:54 | comment | added | HtmlProg | Yes of course, that was rather trivial. Thanks! | |
| Apr 30 at 7:04 | comment | added | Kostya_I | @HtmlProg we have $f_{ad,ar}-f_{ad,r}>0$ on these spheres, hence by maximum principle everywhere outside of them. | |
| Apr 30 at 7:02 | history | edited | Kostya_I | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Apr 29 at 20:19 | comment | added | HtmlProg | Thanks, this is a nice argument! Might be a naïve question: but to show that inequality, you're saying it's since the values of $f_{ad,r}$ on spheres of radius $ar$ are smaller than the boundary values. But none of these spheres are touching the origin, so why could we obtain that inequality, specifically at the origin if we only know that the values on the spheres of radius $r$ are smaller? | |
| Apr 29 at 8:53 | history | answered | Kostya_I | CC BY-SA 4.0 |