Timeline for Maximal-type inequality for a Borel probability measure supported on a subset of $L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 1 at 22:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 1 at 22:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 23 at 20:11 | history | bounty started | Dispersion | ||
| S Apr 23 at 20:11 | history | notice added | Dispersion | Draw attention | |
| Apr 23 at 1:37 | comment | added | Dispersion | The reason we consider a measure supported on $L^2$ comes from a quantum de Finetti theorem which tells us that for a natural initial datum, it may be written as the convex combination of tensorized states with respect to exactly a Borel measure supported on $S$. | |
| Apr 23 at 1:29 | comment | added | Dispersion | I actually want $\hat{\phi}$ since I am interested for various reason in studying the Gross-Pitaevksi hierarchy with initial data lying in some tensorized version of the space $\mathcal{F}L^1(\mathbb{R}^d)$, one of them being that the space is an algebra. | |
| Apr 23 at 1:17 | comment | added | Liding Yao | The Fourier transform is isometry on $L^2(\Bbb R^d)$. Should we better replace $\hat\phi$ by $\phi$? | |
| Apr 22 at 19:14 | comment | added | Dispersion | Why the downvote? I am definitely open to editing the question given suggestions to improve it. | |
| Apr 22 at 19:14 | history | edited | Dispersion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 146 characters in body; edited title
|
| Apr 17 at 4:14 | history | asked | Dispersion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |