Timeline for The largest digital sum of the square of an n-digit number
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23 at 5:10 | history | edited | Mrexcel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated results
|
| Apr 18 at 9:15 | comment | added | Mrexcel | @Claude Chaunier Perhaps “ lower bounds” can more accurately describe the sequence.Thanks. | |
| Apr 18 at 7:09 | comment | added | Claude Chaunier | Is your sequence exact, or lower bounds? On math.se edited later on, you say 469 and 484 are lower bounds. | |
| Apr 16 at 10:19 | comment | added | Alex M. | @JukkaKohonen: I have suggested to the moderators that this post should be converted into a comment, not that it should be deleted. (Compare this post with Moritz Firsching's comment, which says something similar but for base $2$.) | |
| Apr 16 at 8:52 | comment | added | Jukka Kohonen | I disagree with Alex. This is not a full answer, but clearly this is a partial answer that adds information towards the question. Quoting an answer in Meta: "Half an answer is better than no answer at all. Posting the progress you have made may provide the piece missing in someone else's partial answer. An answer doesn't have to be complete, just helpful." | |
| Apr 16 at 6:05 | review | Late answers | |||
| Apr 16 at 6:49 | |||||
| S Apr 16 at 5:49 | review | First answers | |||
| Apr 16 at 5:57 | |||||
| S Apr 16 at 5:49 | history | answered | Mrexcel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |